American Samoa Meaning

Mosquito based monitoring of the lymphatic filariosis according to the Custom Drug Administration in American Samoa

The incidences of lymphocytic filariosis (LF) in many regions of the world, among them American Samoa, have been drastically decreased by Mark A. Schmaedick, Amanda L. Koppel, Nils Pilotte, Melissa Torres, Steven A. Williams, Stephen L. Dobson, Patrick J. Lammie, Mass Drug Administr. (MDA) programmes. Colloquially called'molecular xenomonitoring', parasitic DNA or rare fied DNA can be identified in humans.

In order to test mosquitos caught on the populated American Samoa Isles, we identified areas where further AF transfer is possible after MDA has been completed. Gnats were gathered from most settlements on the biggest isle of America, Tutuila, and all the larger settlements on the smaller Aunu' u, Ofu, Olosega and Ta' u Isles with the help of BG Sentinel-trap.

Realtime PCR was used to identify W. bancrofti genomic W. bancrofti genomic genomics in pool samples from Moskitos, and PoolScreen was used to determine the widespread prevalence of W. bancrofti genomic genomics in the mosquito. Usureria bancrofti would be found in mosquitos of 16 of the 27 areas on Tutuila and Aunu' u Isles, but none of the five towns on the Manu' a Isles Ofu, Olosega and Ta' u.

In the LF vectors Ae. poliynesiensis, the overall estimation of the 95% trust range for W. bancrofti was 0.20-0. 39%, and parasitic-DNA has been shown in swimming pool of Culex quarquefasciatus, Aedes Egypti and Aedes (Finlaya) spp. Our results suggest a low but common incidence of LF on Tutuila and Aunu'u, where 98% of the populations live, but not Ofu, Olosega and Ta'u islets.

XenoMonitoring can help in identifying areas of possible LT transfer, but its use in the American Samoa LT removal programme is restricted by the need for more effective insect control techniques and a better understand the relation between the presence of W. bancrofti CDN in gnats and human infections and transfer-rate.

Sensible molecule detection techniques for the detection of parasitic DNR in insect populations, together with effective insect trapping techniques, can help to detect areas of persistent LF transfer that may need further attention after MDA has eradicated the transfer in most areas. After completing a number of yearly MDA' s, we were testing mosquitos from communities across American Samoa.

Widely spread but low incidence of parasitic DNA in mosquitos from two of the five islets indicated persistent LF. This trial used the presence of parasitic DNA in mosquitos to help in identifying areas where humans are infected and could require further attention. From now on, the use of more effective methodologies for collecting locally sourced insects would allow for greater sampling and more accurate estimation of abundance.

Furthermore, the development of a better knowledge of the epidemiologic importance of the parasites DVD presence in spot mosquitos will enhance the operative value of these assessments for LF eradication outcomes. Lymphofilariasis (LF), due to the daily sub-periodic shape of the mosquito-borne Wuchereria bandcrofti parasitical neematode, is indigenous to American Samoa, an area of the United States consisting of the most eastern isles of the Samoan Sea Range (Figure 1).

The LF is also indigenous to the west part of the island, forming the sovereign Samoa nation[1],[2]. Aedes ( "Stegomyia") Polynesian Marks and Aedes ( "Finlaya") Veloanus ( "Grünberg") are the main vector of LF[3],[4] in the Samoan arcipelago. Aedes ( "Stegomyia") and Aedes ( "Finlaya") have also been found to have epidemiological significance, but these types are not regarded as epidemically important due to their relatively low frequency of mating.

The polynesian Aedes is very common in the southern Pacific and inhabits inhabited areas to the east, just below the Tuvalu and Fiji equators, as far as the Marquesas and Pitcairn Islands[7]. One of Aedes polynesiensis's main dispersants is a faint dispersant that travels seldom up to 92 m[12],[11]. It is only found in American Samoa and Samoa and breeds mainly in the axillary of the woodclimber Freycinetia reeckei in American Samoa and in the armpits of F. reeckei and Pandanus spp. in Samoa[5],[13].

Female Aedes samoanu eat at night[5],[6]. Ae. samoanus' propagation abilities were not studied. The other mosquitos found in Samoa and American Samoa are Culex (Culex) quarquefasciatus Say, Culex (Culex) erulirostris Skuse, Culex (Culex) sitiens Wiedemann, Aedes (Stegomyia) anegypti ( Aedes ( "Finlaya") seaicus Belkin and Aedes ( "Aedimorphus") noccturnus ([7],[14]; however, none of these types have been found which have played a significant part in the LF transfer on the Samoan islands[12],[5],[14],[15].

In 2000-2010, the Department of Health of American Samoa conducted a program to eradicate AF through the yearly dosing of diethyl carbamazine and albumendazole[ 16]. It was linked to similar campaigning in other South Pacific lands and areas, as well as neighbouring Samoa, as part of the Pacific program to eradicate lymphatic filariasis[17].

Pre -, intra- and post-MDA infectious disease prevention was primarily controlled by an immunochromatography (ICT) test that detected circulatory filarielles ( "CFA") delivered into the human body by W. bancrofti[18] adults. CFA was 16 prevalent in a 1999 baseline population. 5 %[19], and tests carried out in four dentinal towns showed that CFA was 11.

Prevalencies in another four settlements interviewed in 2006 were higher, ranged from 2. 1% to 4. 6%[20],[21], and a nationwide 2007 survey revealed 2. 3 percent CFA-prevalence. The study of the general public for CFA can give information on the incidence of W. hancrofti infections, and tests on antibodies can give a susceptible indication of W. hancrofti exposure[22].

Furthermore, the study of the mortality rate can be done by indirect collection of samples of mosquitoes that are known to eat humans' own food. The use of PCR (polymerase sequence reaction) for detecting parasitic DNA or retrieval of cellular DNA in gnats, allows the study of gnat populations and can be more effective and susceptible than dissection, especially when large amounts of W. bandcrofti need to be studied to find indications of low prevalence[23],[24],[25].

It is also dependent on the provision of effective sampling techniques for endemic varieties to test a large number of mosquitos. For the first and foremost, the BG Sentinel catching system has made it possible to catch large quantities of Ae. polynynesiensis over large geographical areas in American Samoa[26]. Importantly, MX cannot directly measure the current transfer unless the PCR technique used specifically target W. bancrofti's third level infectious larval (L3)[27].

28 ] and Erickson et al. [29], who studied Brugia Malayi, found that parasitic DNA could be found in both vectors and non-vectors of gnats long after the intake of the microfilaria, even if these microfilaria had not survived in the midge. Those who want to directly evaluate the transfer must continue to monitor vessel bite rate and specifically identify G3 in vectors using either vector fly dissection or reversed translitriptase PCR.

The use of MX and conventional xeno-monitoring was investigated in a 2006 trial parallel to the serologic investigation of people in three American Samoa communities. Enclosed mosquitos were investigated by PCR or dissection, and villagers were screened for CFA and antifilar antibodies[21]. The antibodies test used for Bm 14 is an indication of the presence of infection or exposition and may give a favourable outcome before the onset of patented infections[30],[31],[32]).

6 percent of the inhabitants of the three towns were favorable for CFA and 12.5-14. 9 percent affirmative for antifilar IgG4 antibodies against precombinant AM14 antigen[21]. Thrombosis of about half of the Ae. fang found infections prevalencies of 0-0. 90 percent prevalence[25]. To sum up, insensitivity to insects was relatively low, while tests on antigens and antibodies and MX all showed similar results.

These are all three indexed AFs, which occur at low rates in all three communities. All in all, the CFA prevalence in the study was below the thresholds above which the guidance would suggest further MDAs[33]. However, if the AF infectivity is non-uniform in the different sub-populations or geographical areas, some groups or areas may need extra MDA, although the overall AF prevalence is below what is considered necessary to maintain the infectivity in the people.

Ae. polyynesiensis and its vulnerability to the BG sentinel traps indicated that MX with midges from all over American Samoa could be a useful complement to the school-based TAS to detect areas of possible continued LT-spreading. Here we describe the results of PCR tests on W. bancrofti PCR in gnats caught in communities throughout American Samoa.

Insect collection was carried out on the isles of Tutuila, Aunu'u, Ofu, Olosega and Ta'u. The collection was carried out on the island of Aunu'u (Figure 1). They are the only American Samoa island that has been continually populated in recent years. The traps were carried out in the settlements of all the larger towns of the four smaller islets and in 34 of the 67 towns in Tutuila chosen at random.

Those haphazardly chosen settlements included about 57% of the Tutuila people and 52% of the total area[ 34]. For some cases, 2-4 neighboring towns on Tutuila Island were merged and considered as separate areas for traps andanalyses. The TAS found only two infants to be HIV positive[33].

Both of these kids went to college in a Tutuila town that was not chosen by chance to catch mosquitoes. Subsequently, extra pitfalls were carried out in and around the campus using the same methods as in the chosen communities. However, since the schools were not in one of the chosen towns, the information from these cases was not incorporated into the bigger dataset, but is shown as a separate item.

Ten BG sentinel snares lured by BG Lure (Biogents AG, Regensburg, Germany) were set up throughout the entire town ( "BG sentinel traps") and run for about 24 or 48 hours, according to the fishing time. There have been exemptions in the area of the Alega and Avaio towns, where only six booby-traps have been installed, and in Amaua town, where four have been installed.

The snares were eliminated after 24 hours when the fish had arrived at a goal of 200 Ae. polyynesiensis males. Halyards were placed on the floor in places that were sheltered from exposure to the sun and rains, often under roof overhangs of buildings or outhouses, such as unoccupied, open conventional canteens. The placings were set in agreement with the heads of the villages and each family, trying to distribute the snares evenly over the area of each town.

The mosquitos were taken out of the snares twice daily at about 10:00 and 18:30 after the top feed periods of the main vectors Ae. polynesiensis[11],[6]. Because of a tidal wave alarm and a devastation in one of the villages (Vatia), the second control had to be moved to 4:30 pm for 10:00 pm, so that the Vatia snares were running for about 30 minutes.

Gnats gathered on the first fishing days in the towns of Taputimu and Vailoatai were dropped for 5 h instead of 24 or 48 h. Only the second day's fishing from these two towns was used. The mosquitos were anaesthetised with carbondioxide in the lab and the Ramalingam [14] and Huang[37] taxionomic keys were used to identify them on a tablet on an icebag under a stereo microscope.

Only a few mosquitos which could not be detected due to damages or which lacked essential parts of the skull, chest or stomach were not considered in the analyses. Females were placed in micro centrifuge tube swimming pools from ? (range 1-20), which were divided by type, tray, site and sampling date.

Once frozen to make sure all the mosquitos were gone, the vials were kept open in a kiln over night to allow them to cure at 75°C, then capped and placed in a capped desiccant container at 23°C until they were sent for PCR testing at Smith College, Massachusetts, USA. In short, a 4.5 mm galvanized pearl and 180 microliters nitrate powdered salt solution (pH 7.2) were added to each 2 ml Eppendorf vial (Eppendorf North America, Hauppauge, NY, USA) with up to 20 mosquitos.

They were developed to reinforce a long disperse repeating replica of W. hancrofti (LDR; GenBank accession no. AY297458)[39]. There were four different assays used: a reverse assay comprising a 20 non-infected mosquitoes' own sample; PCR positives using W. bancrofti's 1 ng, 100 pg or 10 pg of W. bancrofti's sample; a reverse assay using the same PCRdH2O used in the masters mixture; and a PCR blocker comprising 5 pg W. bandcrofti of the sample added to 10 microliters of reverse assay.

For every lot of samples, PCR checks were carried out both positively and negatively. Where the specimen was at least once again positively and all checks were as anticipated, the specimen was classified as such. The TIGER/Line "Places" shape file of the U.S. Census Bureau 2010 for American Samoa was used to create 1 softwares (Environmental Services Research Incorporated, Redlands, California, USA) and local borders[40].

Some of the cases, booby-traps have been placed in places within the borders of the towns, as indicated by the heads of the townships, but outside the borders on the census office cart. For each type of insect, point estimations and 95% 95% confirmation interval for the proportion of insects with W. bancrofti DNA were computed for the whole specimen and for the most common insect, Ae. polinesiensis, in each of the settlements.

PoolScreen (version 2.0.3) was used to estimate peak similarity point abundance and was calculated using the similarity relationship method[41]. In all, 22,014 females were gathered and screened in 2,629 swimming pools by 2,629 PCR test subjects. The PCR results for the most common types in the cases are shown in Table 1, and the three most common types with >1 pooled positives are shown in Figure 2.

The American Samoa Aedes (Finlaya) includes Ae. oceanicus, Ae. samoanus and Ae. tutuilae. Ae. veloanus. Because of their morphologic similarities and the losses of dandruff in the cases, they were hard to differentiate and were therefore used in combination for PCR tests and analyses. One of the 267 Ae. (Finlaya) spp. swimming pools was PCR-acceptable.

Ae. noccturnus, Cx. angulirostris and Cx sitiens were also caught in smaller numbers. Usureria bancrofti DNA was not found in these strains (n?=? pools). The highest estimate of ovality was in Ae. algypti, although the 95% range of convidence for this type overlaps with that for Ae. polynesia (Table 1).

Catching the three most abundant fly varieties with a >1 plus swimming pools as a percent of the overall number of these three varieties in each town. At the top of each beam is the number of the three types. 10 snares were used in each of the villages for 1-2 day, except in Alega-Avaio and Amaua, where six and four were used.

"The" Satala-Leloaloa area" comprises Satala, Anua, Atuu and Leloaloa towns and "Leone area" comprises Auma, Leone and Puapua towns. In the five large Manu'a island towns of Ofu, Olosega and Ta'u there were no beneficial swimming pooling. In Ae. poliynesiensis, the most common genus there, the maximum unilateral 95% confidence range estimation of ovality across all three Manu'a islands was 0.066% (n?=n?).

In Tutuila and Aunu' u, 38 out of 260 traps placed at least one time. Most ( 16 out of 27) of the villages surveyed on these two islets found beneficial mosquitos. The areas that produce beneficial mosquitos on Tutuila were spread all over the entire isle ('Figure 3').

The most common type of gnat was Aedes polinesiensis, and the estimated prevalences of Ae. polinesiensis from the settlements are shown in Figure 4. The number of Ae. polyynesiensis women or the mean pooled area ( "Figure 5") was not positively correlated, indicating that the number of mosquitos gathered affected the width of trust interval, as shown in Figure 4, but not the prevalance point estima.

There were nine cases that did not generate Ae. polyynesiensis negative pooling, which generated Cx. quarquefasciatus (5 cases), Ae. Egypti (6 cases), or Ae. (Finlaya) spp. On a rural scale, two settlements without ae. poliynesiensis catch Cx. quarquefasciatus positives (Onenoa and Vailoatai) or Ae. Egypti (Vailoatai) basins.

Gnat snares in Tutuila and Aunu'u Islands communities, American Samoa. Fill circuits are snares that capture mosquitos in which PCR tests have identified W. bancrofti presence of PCR genes. Epidemiological estimate of Ae. polyynesiensis female with W. bancrofti trapped genetic material in each town. All polynesial Ae. is displayed above each beam.

"The" Satala-Leloaloa area" comprises Satala, Anua, Atuu and Leloaloa towns and "Leone area" comprises Auma, Leone and Puapua towns. Out of the ten snares set in and around the primary education area by two kids who have been positively screened for CFA in the TAS, five of the snares produce beneficial gnat ponds.

There were two of these cases with ae. poliynesiensis and two with ae. egypti and one with ae. poliynesiensis and ae.egypti. Prevalent estimations were 2. 8 percent with a 95% 95% trust range (0.55-8.0%) (n =n Women) for Ae. Polynesia and 8. 6 percent with a 95% 95% trust range (2.2-20.8 percent) (n = Women) for Ae. anegypti.

The swimming pools of 84 Cx. quarquefasciatus and four Ae. (Finlaya) spp. were all minus. Mosquitoes caught from communities throughout Samoa found proof of the low but common incidence of W. bankrofti infection in Tutuila and Aunu' u Island, which together shelter 98% of the territory's people.

However, the capacity to identify very low W. bankrofti prevalences was restricted due to the low number of mosquitos gathered in many communities. These insensitivities were mirrored in the large interval of trust in evidence in prevalence estimations for many of the communities (Figure 4). The amount of work required to collect midges and the number of swimming pool samples was restricted by the available funds for the projects.

In addition, the nature of the insect sampling methods may have influenced the susceptibility of xenomonitoring[42]. Snails can only contain W. bancrofti when they have finished at least one food. BG Sentinel Catchers used in this trial are engineered to catch host-seeking women, many of whom may be zeroipars looking for their first food.

Gravity trap anthologies that target ovipositive females[43],[44] may contribute to a greater proportion of caught mosquitos having at least one food, but currently available Gravity snares capture few Ae. poliynesiensis (MAS unreleased data). In endophagous fish, the accumulation of dormant gnats in homes can also cause large amounts of previously blood-fed females[45],[24].

Travid trapping and gathering dormant mosquitos in homes have been effectively used for Cx. quinquefasciatus enomonitoring in areas where this type is the main flow factor used. It does not appear to be an important AF vectors in the Samoan Islands[15], but it was the second most common type in our BG sentinel trap and contains an estimate of 0.11% W. bancrofti DNA.

It is an American Samoa test. A high percentage of cases of positive gnats in schools, where two kids were positively screened for CFA, indicated a possible further outbreak. The study of post-IKT smear and PCR tests could find no indication of microfilm remia in either child[33], indicating that they were not the W. bankrofti source discovered in the captured mosquito.

Each of the two kids came from different towns and were living about 1 km from the local schools. Since Ae. polynynesiensis feed time overlaps with the time at home and school[11],[6], in both cases a transfer through this vect. can be made. The 2010 census[46] estimated that 21,196 of America's populations went to prekindergarten and 12,070 of the territory's 16,482 working people travelled more than 15 minutes from home to work.

Ae. polynesiensis' mortality and dietary patterns suggest that the transfer of W. bancrofti probably takes place not only in village areas but also in other places such as jobs, buses and schooling. The results of this trial were similar to the only other trial MX used in American Samoa[25].

One of the three settlements investigated by Hambers et al. [25] was re-examined in the recent work. Predominance of W. bancrofti in Ae. poliynesiensis for village Afao was estimate to be 0. 82% in the 2006 trial and 0. 47% in the present one. Estimations for the ovalence of W. bancrofti in Ae. eegypti were higher in both this and the 2006 studies than in Ae. polyynesiensis, although the 95% confirmation interval for the two types largely overlap in both cases.

Ae. aegypti's high tendency to live on food from man is well known ( [47],[48]) and could lead to a higher incidence of microfilaemic individual nutrition than would be the case for insects with a lower relationship to people. It is not well known how often Aedes parynesiensis eats different kinds of bird and mammal than humans[11],[49],[5].

None W. bancrofti was found in the 262 Ae. upwardensis gathered from the entire area in the present trial. Much the same number of Ae. uploadolensis from three settlements in the previous survey by Hambers et al. [25] found a favorable population. Low recurrence of W. bancrofti genomic genes in this genus and the low number of genes gathered in the village suggest that it is probably a small LF vectors in American Samoa[14].

PCR results for specimens that are not regarded as important LF vector showed indications of W. hancrofti in some places where the results of the Ae. polyynesiensis collection did not. Two of the six cases with ae. aegypti's negative pool and only one of the five cases with Cx. qualquefasciatus also produce poly. ae. poline. siensis.

Tow towns (Onenoa and Vailoatai) were producing Ae. ascypti or Cx. near quanquefasciatus swimming pool from several cases, but not Ae. polyynesiensis swimming Pool. This discrepancy is probably due to behavioural disparities and variations in the three species' relatively abundant occurrence in the fishing areas. Taken together, they suggest that samplings of several different specimens - even non-vectors - with different eating behaviour can give a more comprehensive evaluation of W. bankrofti infection than samplings of just one important type of vaccine.

These three types show important variations in eating behaviour[50],[7],[5]. Like Ae. polyynesiensis, Aedes Egypti eats mainly during the days, but is more endophile than Ae. polyynesiensis. Discrepancies in the extent of movements can also lead to different exposure to W. hancrofti.

Lastly, if several fish stocks are involved in this fishery, the lower susceptibility resulting from a low fishing quota for Ae. polyynesiensis in some communities, as in Vailoatai, could be partly offset by higher stocks of other fish (Figure 2). Multi-type enomonitoring, which includes non-vectors, is a deviation from the method of tracking only a singular type of vessel and compare the estimate of this type of prevalence versus model-based or experiential threshold values to evaluate the progression in LF removal programs[24],[42].

In the Samoan isles the latter is complex due to the existence of an important subsidiary vectory, Ae. veloanus, the absence of an efficient trapping for this type and the difficulties of differentiating it from a related non-vector type in morphology. A further aggravation is the spacial diversity of LF prevention and transmission[56],[57], suggesting that even if the total incidence of large-area gnats falls below a specific goal, some regional variations may outweigh it.

Furthermore, previous attempts at Xenomonitoring have shown that the incidence of W. bancrofti in Ae. poliynesiensis, gathered at a unique site, can significantly differ during one year or even between sampling times, which are only ten separate days[58],[25]. Taken together, these determinants, together with the difficulties of gathering a large number of versus a large number of vectors and the resulting large trust intervals, suggest that the benefits of Xeno-monitoring for the quantification of the progression of LF removal in American Samoa are currently local.

However, even such presence-absence mappings require that enough mosquitos are caught at each site to ensure a high chance of identifying beneficial mosquitos in the places where they appear - something that can be hard to accomplish in areas with low prevalence and catches. To summarize, the evidence of W. bancrofti protein in mosquitos in many places on Tutuila and Aunu' u Isles indicates a high incidence of humans infection on these Isles, while the estimation of low overall prevalence indicates a similarly low overall incidence of people.

However, due to the small size of the samples in many towns, care must be taken to draw conclusions about the variability at regional level. At present, lenomonitoring has little value for American Samoa's program-making beyond its capacity to detect areas where there may be a risk of mortal contamination. To increase its importance for the MDA decisions, further research is needed to establish more effective methodologies for collecting insects and to increase our knowledge of the link between the prevalence of W. bancrofti genomic genomics in insects, the rate of infectious disease in man and the resulting transfer rate in relation to threshold values.

Writers thank Samuel Ioka Meleisea, Malologa Nili and Niela Leifi for their help in catching fish in the fields, the many burgomasters and other villagers and family who have helped set traps in communities, and Dr. Saipale Fuimaono of the Ministry of Health and Tufele Li'amatua of the Office of Samoan Affairs for the facilitation of Samoan governmental action.

Many thanks to Kelisiano Tagaloa, Taimi Maui and Ina Ulberg for their help in Manu'a; and Ranger Carlo Caruso and the National Park of American Samoa for using the park's lab facilities on the island of Ofu. Samoa-Tonga area, Belkin JN (1964) Subperiodic bankroftian filariosis vector.

Igimori K (2001) entomologist of the filaria monitoring program in Samoa, Aedes politynesiensis and Ae. veloanus. Rammingam S (1968) The box-office epidemology of filmic transfer in Samoa and Tonga. su suzuki t, sone f (1974) The bionomy of Filariase vector in western samoa. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae).

First Laird M (1956) Research on mosquitos and fresh water ecosystems in the South Pacific. Work on the productivity of Samoan tanks for Aedes poliynesiensis and Aedes Egypti in four American Samoan victims. Lambda BH, Schmaedick MA, McClintock S, Roberts J, Gurr NE, et al. (2009) Drought period productions of filariasis and dengue vector in American Samoa and comparisons with rainy period plant.

Jakhovsky LA (1954) American Samoa filmasis. V. Bionomics of the main vectors, Aedes politynesiensis Marks. From Byrd EE, St. Amant L, Bromberg L (1945) Studying the Filariose in the Samoan region. Ochlerotatus veloanus in connection with Freycinetia (Pandanaceae) axillary foliage in Samoa, Uchida K, Ichimori K, Paulson GS, Cox PA, Sone F et al.

RAMALIGALINGAM S (1976) A commented check list and key to the mosquitos of Samoa and Tonga. JD King, Zielinski-Gutierrez S, Pa'au M, Lammie P (2011) Improvement of municipal involvement to eradicate lymphoid filariosis in American Samoa.

Liang-JL, King JD, Ichimori K, Handzel T, Pa'au M, et al. (2008) Effects of five round bulk medication with diethyl carbamazine and Albendazol on Wuchereria bankcrofti in American Samoa. In Mladonicky' JM, King JD, Liang JL, Chamber' s E, Pa'au M, et al. (2009) Assessment of the transfer of lymphoid filariosis with parasitological, serological and entomological instruments after administering bulk drugs in American Samoa.

Clichart, Laney SJ, Sechan Y, Davies N, Legrand A-M (2006) Screening and di-section as a tool for monitoring the filary plague of Aedes poliynesiensis mosquito in Polynesia in France. CHAMBER' S EW, McClintock SK, Avery MF, King JD, Bradley MH, et al. (2009) Xenomonitoring of Wuchereria bandcrofti and Dirofilaria Imitis mosquitoes from American Samoa: Thoughts on catching and comparing the effects of polymersase chains-reactivity tests with divisection.

schmädick ma, ball ts, burkot tr, gurr ne (2008) Analysis of three cases for taking samples of aedes polinesiensis and other mosquitos in american samoa. Josemaría P, Erickson SM, Josemaría K, Fuchs JF, Rao RU, et al. (2007) Persistent Brugia Malayi genetic material in vectors and non-vectors mosquitoes: implication for xeno and transmittance monitorings of lymphoid filariosis.

U.S. Census Bureau (2012) 2010 Census for American Samoa. American Samoa by village: 2010. Soil investigation of American Samoa by Nakamura S (1984). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in collaboration with the Government of American Samoa. He is Liu Z, Gurr NE, Schmaedick MA, Whistler WA, Fischer L (2011) Vegetation mapping of American Samoa.

Huang-Y-M (1977) The mosquitos of Polynesia with a visual cipher to some types associated with filariosis and/or dengueever. Atkinson LJ, Ramzy RMR, Helmy H, Farid HA, et al. (2006) A real-time PCR-based assay for the identification of Wuchereria bancrofti genetic material in human hemoglobin and midge. Rudersen EM, Stolk WA, Laney SJ, Michael E (2009) The roll of insect control in the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphoid Filariosis.

GOODMANS DS, Orelus J-N, Roberts JM, Lammie PJ, Streit TG (2003) PCR and mosquitodissection as a tool for monitoring filaria infections after bulk use. Ireland SR, Moore SJ, Derua YA, Bruce J, Cameron MM (2013) Analysis of gravitational scars for the Culex aquefasciatus library, a lymphocytic filariosis in Tanzania.

U.S. Census Bureau (2013) Census for American Samoa. Templeis CH, Hayes RO, Hess AD, Reeves WC (1970) Hawaiian four gnat diet.

Scott TW, Morrison AC, Lorenz LH, Clark GG, Strickman D, et al. (2000) Long-term study of Aedes Ayypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand and Puerto Rico: demographic dynamic. Horsffall WR (1955) Mosquitoes: Harrington LC, Scott TW, Lerdthusnee K, Coleman RC, Costero A, Clark GG, Jones JJ, Kitthawee S, Kittayapong P, Sithiprasasasna R, Edman JD (2005) Distribution of the Dengue sector Aedes Ayypti within and between peasant towns.

Travel WK, Milby MM, Meyer RP, Pfuntner AR, Spoehel J, et al. (1991) Mark-release-recapture trials with copper mosquito ("Diptera: Culicidae") in Southern California. Josephs H, Maloney J, Maiava F, McClintock SK, Lammie PJ, et al. (2010) First indications of a spacial clusters of lymphoid filariosis in an end-emic area of Aedes polyynesias.

RUSSLELL RC, Webb CE, Davies N (2005) Aedes Ayypti (L.) and Aedes Polyynesiensis Marks (Diptera: Culicidae) in Moorea, France-Polynesia: a trial of mature populations and pathogens (Wuchereria bankcrofti and Dirofilaria immitis) to indicate local and endemic epidemiologic risks for dementia and filariosis.