Geo Maps AucklandGeomaps Auckland
Uniform plan Suggested zoning - the maps
Last week's release, endorsed by the Independent Hearing Committee (IHP), almost doubles the number of homes they believe can be constructed over the next 30 years. The greatest difference by far is that it will allow more homes within the current city area, from 84,000 in the 2013 registered IHP up to 270,000 in the IHP registered in 2013, a huge 221% upturn.
Whereas part of the rise is due to changes in the regulations, most of the rise is due to a shift inzone. On Wednesday, the Board emphasized that the 270,000 euros raise in the current city area had been largely achieved: Remember: Single House and MHS are both restricted to two floors, while MHU is restricted to three floors.
Out of all permitted areas (the living areas plus the centers and mixed-use areas), about 69% of the total area is restricted to two floors, and that is 88% to three or fewer floors. That is, only 12% of the areas where humans are living can be larger than 3 floors - this will not be a high-rise town.
One can see that with the exceptions of the inner western and inner Isthmic (which are also mostly subjected to a special character overlay - but that is another story) there is much less single house Zoning this was mostly substituted by MHS, but one can also see much more than that in and around the city centers.
South Isthmus in Owairaka, Three Kinings and Royal Oak allows some proper clustering that would form good anchorages for the suggested tramways. There' is also more THAB that is also entitled in other areas, such as Panmure, where the Herald's topical favorite pair of complainers are isolated - they should be lucky that their belongings are now more worthy.
Other minor changes have also been made, such as the Morningside station, where the zone division has been moved from mainly light industry to mainly mixed use, which will allow many more residents to stay next to one of the best situated railway stops after the CRL is over. Zonation on the isthmus is a much better approach, although I still think that the IHP could have gone further in some areas.
First thing you can see right away is the huge amount of additional plots in the Future Urban Zone just south of SH1. There are a few small bags of THAB in the marina and a little in the centre of the penninsula on the Whangaparaoa promises, but overall it is almost all single house, there are very few new apartments permitted, which once again poses many issues, how important an elaborate venture like Penlink is when there are many other areas that are fast expanding and also need investmen.
Occidental areas already had one of the better-looking zones in the suggested map thanks to the presence of much more dense areas than any other, resulting in a high THAB and MHU share. In some areas, such as the Te Atatu Peninsula, the suggested map has further expanded this.
IHP has also suggested zonation for the large Red Hills region just West of Westgate rather than using it as a prospective city state. Amendments to zone allow more homes, but that does not mean that they will all be taken up, as not everyone will be developing their country to the max permitted under the scheme, and in many cases the housing existing today will still be in 30 years from now.
Some of the big discrepancies you can see are in the Western world, where zonation allows a great deal of evolution, but much of it is not seen as possible under this scheme. There are many more details, even if you only compare the difference in the cards.