Blonde on Black PeopleA blonde on black people
Do black females flatten their locks, colour blond or carry blondes?
This disagreement can mean the distinction between receiving or not receiving work (aka race discrimination) or even loss of work. Or in some cases, not smoothing the coat could make the big deal of whether or not they are even permitted to go to university. Slurry is sometimes a penalty for black girl who does not smooth or stylize her coat in accordance with the aesthetic of whites.
That is why black ladies who meet EU norms are not appropriate. It' a symbol that they have to adapt in a supremacistic whitish community where whites set the standard of female elegance and decency. When people with authority in school, the work place and other powerful bodies (including majorstream media) do not tell black females that something is not right with black hair/hairstyles and that black females do not definition (smoothed) of black hairdos, style and characteristics as work place norms, then fewer black females would stick to it.
Well, on the other side is the inverse acquisition. Although black females and females are punished social and sometimes professional for carrying black naturally occurring black coat, whites are often quite free to violate other people's style of aesthetics with much less control. Black females are thus limited in who they can be and what they can look like, but when it comes to the culture of other people, whites and whites in general have almost unlimited inroads.
These ambiguities help to determine the acquisition of culture. Whites can use and benefit from other people's culture and ultimately reject it; blacks are often compelled to become part of the Eurocentric. Whites (and whites) can take advantage of other people's appearance, aesthetic and culture by dressing and undressing like a suit.... And at the same token, black men (and black women) are made to think they are less good or worse because they live in their own skins and wear their natural given-haired.
This is, of course, something the blacks have been dealing with for generation. This is not so much a grievance, but it is illuminating why your issue is based on a mistaken equivalent and a basic misconception of what makes the acquisition of cultures what it is. CONCLUSION: If whites have defined[dominant] cultures for generation and punish colored people for not adhering to them, then a black man who follows the actual pressure of assembly is not an adoption.
It is a process of learning when whites define the prevailing civilization (in school, workplace and other government institutions), limiting the space where non-whites can be comfortable themselves - and then penetrating the few civilized areas that people take advantage of colour for themselves (for their own comfort and sometimes for profit).
It is a symbol of Caucasian predominance in operation (although there are certainly much more immediate perilous demonstrations of Caucasian dominance).